a person takes an occupational Survey data (+1 or 2 fresh, third party) +a existing alignment emulation model / trigger analysis mod "what would happen" emu then do all sorts of manual tagging, for maximum real world grounding
a person takes an occupational Survey data (+1 or 2 fresh, third party) +a existing alignment emulation model / trigger analysis mod "what would happen" emu then do all sorts of manual tagging, for maximum real world grounding
Project Details
Updated 07/09/26 · Provided via application · VerifiedHello,
traditional Alignment models these days
may lack the additional grounding to Real Life Outcome
(not quite sure, but it departs from this premise, as a (if) base)
We take Survey data(s) on Occupation, how each occupation (150+)
Will use the AI tooling , and plan to use, and or oppose
and then we procure an Extra survey from third party
1
We gather the data
(as above, from state and third party)
2
WE tag those data
onto either a existing Alignment Model / Trigger Model categories
3
We interview the people
record and ask to publish or put onto the work result
4
We expand & oppose using their use case
see if there's a case where either
they agree / disagree with an existing models'
alignment limits & not even reaching those
(already met the difficulty of monetizing
if even provided with ai fully)
5
we compare the results
with an existing ai alignment emulation model /
risk trigger model
(for example, if suppose a graphic designer,
decides to flood the market using
time-gated pseudonyms and
So what we then have
is a pool of
Occupation + Use of AI + opposition of "alignment" or
encroaching use from outside of their scope
(suppose they are "worried about this and that")
then:
make or attach to or compare
to an emulation
[] before [] tag
[] after [] compare
and then those forms the
% data of Indonesia, or per state, and what the people do in that state
then those people are "emulated"
as to how things might play out, if they win (interest is bolstered/kept)
or if normally
then some interesting outcomes / outlooks on the aggregate
if suppose any current policy (to be plugged from outside)
is the one that remains, what kind of change
would have happened in that landscape,
after the time period of
"emulated, occupational emulation, after introduction of plenty of AI"
then we compare this result with
a neighboring AI Risk / emulation models,
and tell them if we managed to obtain
new categories, better accuracy, or just provide support grounding
and the "validation" that their prediction,
vs
how each occupation
views their life, whether knowingly or not, after
their occupation gets seeded with AI use
Theory of Impact
Updated 07/09/26 · By grantmaking.ai- Validate / improve other alignment models' presumed
emulation of society and the impact of ai introduction
and their notions of risk & triggers
other than that; as a technical pre-step::
>
we have occupational interviews
(to tag the parameters properly)
and their imagined "what can go wrong"
"if my competitor use AI and i dont"
"or if a big business were to suck things"
and then the interesting ones of those
in the survey, will be tagged & plugged onto
an ai emulation risk model
and we compare the external's emulation result
with how the reality in the ground changes
(when we do the followup, or ongoingly)
It will source alot of validation &
agreement / opposition from the plebs
in a locality, with inside knowledge
and links to the occupation
(so its a basic canvasing of whether or not
ai impacted, or ai emulation made good of)
People
Updated 07/09/26 · By grantmaking.aiTeam Member
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.